I’m Coming Out

At thirteen, I climbed live oak in the backyard and said “gay” out loud. I knew I had committed a sin. No one could hear me. My parents and sister were inside the house or, at least, far out of earshot. Even so, I was scared to say it.

I knew, more or less, what the word meant. I did not quite think it belonged to me or defined what I felt, but I recognised that it made me feel something — it was charged with treachery and transgression.

It still is. All these years later, and with all the other words I know now, “gay” is still a blunt, in-your-face, limp-wristed battle cry. It means a man who fucks men, who takes it up the ass or fucks an asshole, who prances around gay bars or prowls dark corners waiting to strike unlucky men (depending on which homophobe you ask). I love being gay.

I realised, a few years later, there was a problem: I did like girls. Only sometimes — and not in the super-sexual way I liked men. But something was there, some heat between “gay” and “straight”, the only two options I believed existed for me.

The fact that I needed some privacy that day in the tree tells me I understood what the word meant, but saying it was not momentous, not a flash of self-recognition that comes for some when they watch porn or touch a dick for the first time. I knew what I wanted — what I wanted done to me, how I felt about boys in my class — but the word still felt ill-fitting. And it still does.

The word came to me as most words come to kids: through other kids. They said it on the playground. It was the same as calling someone stupid. “You’re so gay!” a guy shouted when a teammate fumbled the ball, lost a point, whatever. Some classmates spelt it out — G-A-Y — instead of saying it outright because it was, for them, a curse word. It wasn’t one of the fun curse words like “shit” and “damn”. It lived in that second category of ones we innately understood as truly punishable, truly bad. I don’t member anyone getting in trouble for saying it, as they would have been punished for saying “shit” or “damn” in class, but I remember a teacher reprimanding someone a few grades below me during an outdoor activity: “Don’t you ever say that word again!”

Everything changed the day in church when I learned the word’s real meaning. Philip, a blond boy about my age — ten, maybe — asked our Sunday school teacher about “gay people”. I don’t remember her initial answer, but I remember her explaining that gay people are men who have turned away from God and have sex with each other. She was visibly uncomfortable. She said homosexuality was a sin.

I knew sin. By then, I had spent time overseas — my parents were missionaries and founded a Christian orphanage in Zambia, Africa. I grew up with a fair sampling of the various micro-sects of conservative Christianity during my childhood. The general consensus among them was that gay people were against God.

That’s how they said it: against. Gays were not merely unaware of the Bible’s mandates like people in Africa were — people who, with white missionary help, could be saved once they heard the truth. No, gay people were combatants: they were actively opposed to the word of God. Their lifestyle was antagonistic against everything the church stood for. They had heard the truth and abandoned it. They were not lost — they chose to leave. There was an understanding that one should not try to save a gay person or even approach one because they were dangerous. They were enemies of Christ, disfigurations of something holy. That holy thing, I later learned, was marriage — a thing believed by Christians to be the purest representation of God on earth.

I was fascinated by all this. I loved theology, even at a young age. But then, I was in the tree, looking across the field, some years older from the Sunday school lesson, knowing that “gay” rang something true and recognisable in me. I was clear-headed enough to know that a strong reaction to its mere utterance was not a good sign. It was fire and excitement. It tasted like disobedience. I then spent years praying over it.

Today, I am gay, though I still struggle with the word. I am frustrated that I had to choose a label because I still have occasional fantasies about girls. “Bisexual” was considered until I hooked up with a non-binary person who did not identify with any gender — which helped me realise that gender itself was not a huge factor in my arousal. I was pansexual, fluid, or, really, just kinky. I was a faggot when I wanted to be submissive and degraded. I was a top on rare occasions. I was a boy to daddies, a lover to my lovers, a friend to my friends. Were all these words not enough?

Most of my fantasies involved men. The majority of my sex was with men. But “gay” still felt like the closest word to what I really was, not the word. Thankfully, a teacher in college had a saying: labels are tools, not cages. It took time for this lesson to sink in — until after college, in fact — but now I think I have it. A word is something one uses for utility because it can make life (and dating) easier. But it is not the summation of one’s being. It does not tell everything. No single word can do that.

The queer community makes a fuss over labels and terms. I think we would do well to remember my teacher’s lesson: Labels are tools, not cages. Terms are not fixed. Identities change. Desires are anarchic, forever in flux. No label must last forever.

I think I will keep saying “gay.” It does the job. As a social practice, labelling oneself feels systematic, very neat and clean, just something one does. But my identity, whatever it is, is not clean. It is messier, instinctive, and hungry. It wants and wants.

My generation is the children of the Internet. New words come to us quickly, and more are coming. How do we cut through the confusion and land on anything? I encourage friends to try many labels. I did. I have friends who evolved from “lesbian” to “queer” to “nonbinary” in just a few years. How exciting! Even our collective label, “queer,” is a reclamation of an old slur. Everything changes, and change is nature.

Take away the words and I am just another person looking for sex. It is that simple. My need for the company of others is universal. It should ring true to anyone, no matter how they identify. Desire and loneliness are the human condition, things we all share. I share these things with Christians who hate me and with other gay men who think they are too sexy to even look at me. Why can others not see our shared humanity? I think, at times, labels themselves are partly to blame — they entrench us into groups and fuel animosity against others Labels are useful but can be misused.

Christians are not hard to understand. They are people moved by words. I have been moved by words too. I am a writer. I get it. Language is powerful and terrifying. If I thought I had the word of God in my hands, I would probably feel as they do. But creation is not just the territory of God — I do it every day. I write stories and poems and make worlds happen on pages. I play this game too. I eat gods for breakfast.

In my freshman year, a lesbian couple explained to me what a clitoris was at IHOP one night. One of them drew an illustration on a napkin. I remember the drawing, a black thing like a bug or butterfly, resting there, open. Later, when I finally touched a real-life clitoris, I was amazed to see that it did actually look like the drawing. I rubbed my finger over it as if I was tracing it on paper, and she gasped.

I started exploring my desire for men long before the clitoris — illustrated and otherwise. I remember a day in high school, walking through the woods with my father. He was trying to teach me about identifying trees. I was not paying attention — I was thinking about a guy named Johnson who I thought was about to kiss me the last time we spoke. Johnson was my first great love. I do not remember much about him except the feeling of that love and how it burned in me during that walk with my dad. This was a beautiful thing bursting in me that, if shared, would bring only damnation and punishment. What I felt was as natural as the trees. I could be identified by an eagle-eyed observer of humans: “Ah, here is a sparkly one!”

I was something to celebrate. Dad could not see that. Soon, Johnson vanished from my life — he ran away to California and was picked up by the police near the state line. I never talked to him again. Even so, the memory of his almost-kiss burned in me and nothing else mattered. Years later, I heard he got mixed up in bad drugs. I still do not know what happened to him or where he is now.

But he was going to kiss me. My longing — the absence of his kiss — fueled me until college. It carried me through many fights with Dad and through my coming out in high school. In college, many men kissed me. College was where I got drunk and stumbled home with them. Every man I undressed was a discovery, not of them, but of me. I learned myself. I found the animal in me, reflected in their eyes.

When I think of gay sex now, the word “rapture” comes to mind. In Christianity, the rapture is the taking of the saved in the last days — something Christians love to fantasize about. What a word to use, “rapture” — what a person feels in the throes of orgasm. The word is synonymous with “ecstasy”. Once, the word filled me with fear of the end times, fear of Hell. Now it is the best descriptor for getting fucked in the ass.

My first college boyfriend lasted only two weeks. Once, late at night, he held me against a tree and kissed me. Later, I saw the tree was a Southern live oak, like the one I climbed when I first spoke the truth. Like the sermon on the mount. I am what I am.

Love, Beastly

15 Comments

  1. Brilliantly and beautifully written, as per usual. I appreciate the insight into men, as I feel totally the same but opposite – I understand my fellow women but completely don’t get men, yet as a straight woman I’m totally fascinated with them. The problem with heterosexual sex is that we simply don’t know what we’re doing to each other, and that frustration is part of the excitement. You should try it. 😉

    Like

  2. Hate to break it you young gayling but you are not so much “bi-curious” as pining for the heterosexual life you will never have and managing to dehumanize women along the way. Through in some bad, warmed over gender essentialist BS – women aren’t some alien species that men are doomed to never understand and their sexuality ins’t some prize to be conquered by hyper-masculine men, straight or gay, and magic dicks. Maybe you should spend less time dreaming that you will find this fictional woman who meets all these superficial aesthetic masculine requirements and by some miracle trick your dick into staying hard just long enough for penetration. Then you can finally be free from the gay world you are still so uncomfortable with and maybe bring home some butch girl to make your parents and their god happy that you aren’t like the rest of those poor fags who don’t have the same fortitude that you do to cultivate that tiny sliver of supposed heterosexuality that you are so pleased about. Here is an alternate theory – like a large chunk of gay men, you are hoping that by coming out again as “bi-curious” you are holding out hopes for you and your parents that with enough work, you can live that prized heterosexual life that you still want deep down inside…It will probably take you another few years to finally slay that remaining dragon and embrace your gay identity not out of some fatalistic “I can’t help it” view of gayness but out of an affirmative embrace for all the great things that come from loving another man.

    PS – Do you really think these women fantasy about the great sex they could be having with limp dicked, gay men who hope that they can “break themselves in” by experimenting with her anatomy – nothing more than a human sex toy to hopefully retrain your homoness for that sweet heterosexual coitus?

    Like

    1. ^ Ladies and gentleman, I present bi-phobia at its ugliest. This commenter is laboring under the delusion that bisexuality isn’t real, that sexuality isn’t fluid, and that a self-identified gay man cannot physically desire and fantasize about women. I believe that desires are a composite of fantasy and sincerity, stereotyping and idealizing, confusion and clarity. Desires are messy, and do not fit into these hard labels we have created to quantify them. I am, actually, sincerely, bi-curious, and I am not trying to “shy away” or apologize for my homo attractions by admitting this truth. This bi-curiosity is sexual and physical and certainly objectifying — but no more objectifying than the way I envision the men I would love to fuck. A cursory glimpse of my blog should be enough to convince anyone that I am not “pining” for a heterosexual life, but in case there’s any confusion: I’m queer, which means I resist hard labels and clear definition, although I will say that the majority of my attractions are for gay men. Does this make me gay? For the sake of convenience and a more succinct Scruff profile, yes.

      Like

      1. As I only recently ran across your blog after reading one of your advocate columns about your bisexual boyfriend, what actually surprised me about this post was the striking difference, both factually and theoretically, between the two. The sudden zeal to find your inner bisexual and the seemingly desperate, obsessive logical parsing of yourself to find some glimmer of potential heterosexual desire, was completely absent from the Advocate article, which came across as more sincere and authentic defense of bisexuality. In the Advocate article, the contrasting sexualities of gay and bisexual men came across as sincere, heartfelt, and thus helpful in making the case for gay men to recognize that most bisexual men are not self-loathing gay men still stuck in a partial closet still suffering from the envy of the powerful privileges that society uses to enforce heterosexuality on us. Why no mention of this newfound “bicuriosity” that you are keen to promote on your blog in the Advocate article? Did you strategically exclude this tidbit fearing that that the very gay men you were hoping to persuade may find you less credible? Or is this a reaction to what you yourself noted as your own inability to refrain from cheating? Have you know idealized your former boyfriend’s bisexuality and now want to claim apart of it for yourself? Much of the resistance gay men have had to bisexuality is grounded in the justifiable fear that so long as homophobia and heterosexism are so ingrained in our society, bisexuality can reinforce in gay men many of the evils that still haunt us – the fetishing of hyper-masculinity, the toxic combination of homophobia and misogyny that imposes a hierarchy of beauty and desire with the “masculine” at the top and the “feminine” at the bottom, and finally both overt and subtle association of heterosexuality with masculinity and homosexuality with femininity, both by the heterosexual majority and tragically even among many of the homosexual minority. No discussion of bisxuality, especially among men, can ignore these larger, structural forces when evaluating both the action of individuals and collective norms that can arise in minority communities.
        I have to admit that I left the original blog comment out of anger as I was very impressed and moved by the Advocate article and so I googled you to find your blog hoping to find similar commentary. When I found this blog post praising your own cultivation of something vaguely approaching “bi-curiosity” and the implication that gay men, whom by definition aren’t attracted to women, are somehow less evolved or even biphobic if suspect that there is nothing new here. Most gay men have spouted the same line when they struggle with accepting their own homosexuality and many claim a transitory bisexual identity as they transition to being openly gay.
        Ultimately, no one should really take seriously what anyone says on sex blog as such blogs are really just another form of soft core porn – can be entertaining, even get you off but not dependale in the long run…

        Like

        1. Oh boy. There’s a lot of unpack there, but I’ll attempt to address your points in order. 1. I didn’t mention my own bisexual curiosity in the Advocate article because I had a word limit. 2. You seem to be looking for underlying reasons as to why I may be bi-curious, when I don’t think there need to be any. I just am, and I’m not sure why that needs defending or explaining. 3. You’re inserting a discussion about cultural norms regarding masculinity and femininity that on its own is a sincere and good discussion to be had that certainly has far-reaching implications in gay male culture, but is not mentioned in my blog post, in my article, or anywhere I’ve written about bisexuality. 4. I don’t see bisexuality as a transitional “phase” between heterosexuality and homosexuality, and I don’t think it’s illegitimate or even unrealistic to be bi-curious. Granted, many gay men and women have used the label of bisexuality to this end, which does nothing but hurt bi visibility. I’m not doing that. I’m simply discussing my own bi-curiosity. Is that so absurd? 5. Your final comment makes me completely disregard everything else you’ve said. You’re eloquent and passionate, but that final, prudish, sex-negative dig shows that you’re really not here for a real debate. You’re here to pick a fight. Kid, I enjoy a good text battle, but only with someone worthy of the time. A sex blog, in my humble opinion, can and should be taken seriously, and can be very dependable. What’s wrong with soft core porn? I’d hardly consider my blog that outlandish, but I appreciate the descriptor. Au revoir.

          Like

      2. How butch of you to let us know that you are such a viral man, dare I say “straight acting”? What is more “straight acting” than having sex with a woman? Maybe that is what is really motivating you…

        Like

        1. Where, in the article or in these comments, have I mentioned “straight-acting”? That’s truly an offensive and silly turn of phrase. What is so implausible about the idea that I may actually want to have sex with people of both genders?

          Like

  3. Oh my goodness. Reading this post has my heart beating faster and my imagination afire. Coming up to me and stating you are a beginner is an extraordinary turn on. I love your blog and thoughtful articles and that sentence would bowl me over.

    Liked by 1 person

  4. Oh my goodness. Reading this post has my heart beating faster and my imagination afire. Coming up to me and stating you are a beginner is an extraordinary turn on. I love your blog and thoughtful articles and that sentence would bowl me over.

    Like

Leave a comment